What is IR35?
It’s important to have a full understanding of what IR35 entails before you know how it is changing. In the simplest form, IR35, which is also known as ‘intermediaries legislation’, is a series of tax laws that came into effect in 2000 and have been revised over subsequent years. Its purpose was at first to ensure that contractors who stated that they owned limited companies were genuinely self-employed, but over time it has evolved into a set of rules designed to curb the tax benefits self-employed workers altogether.
Working through a Limited Company has always been more tax efficient than being an employee because the government wanted to financially reward those enterprising enough to go it alone and invest in the economy (with the hope of making money and creating jobs). The problem for the government was that Limited Companies were meant to be for people who bought and sold goods or services to multiple clients, not necessarily contractors who didn’t need to invest large sums of capital to start a business and acted like an employee.
In 2000 this presented a real fiscal problem for the government, who found a number of employees had chosen to leave their employed roles only to return to work as a contractor. The sole purpose of this change was to reduce the amount of tax they paid. The government therefore designed IR35 to make sure this could not continue. However, for all its good intentions in 2000, IR35 has been subject to several changes since it was first put in place, and April 2020 it will see even more changes designed to increase tax revenues.
These changes haven’t been without controversy. Many contractors who legitimately work short term contracts, moving from company to company to offer their specialist services have now been caught by IR35 and lost their tax benefits as a result.
Changes to IR35
IR35 has existed since 2000 and has been subjected to different amendments over time. Despite these changes, it has been criticised as not being effective enough by some while others claim it goes too far.
The government believes that too many people are still illegitimately working as ‘disguised employees’ and claim that they are self-employed for the tax benefits. This means that they operate like a standard employee, without control over how and when they work, what work they do and other factors.
According to HMRC, working in this way means that they are not ‘a business in their own account.’ As many contractors work side by side with employees, this interpretation of running a business has in turn been criticized, with many contractors feeling like because they are a micro-business with just one employee they are seen as an easy target for the government to raise tax revenue from.
For the most part from 2000 to 2017, in order to be classed as “outside” of IR35, contractors would need to jump through a number of vague hoops. These included things like:
- Writing the right to substitution into their contract (even though in practice it was unlikely they would send an employee to do the work).
- Not being managed by their client, and working to their own working schedule/holidays.
- Having their own office and web presence.
Those that turned up to work wearing an employee uniform, worked organized shift patterns, and were managed by the client, would have been classed as “inside” IR35 and had to pay their taxes as if they were employed but as there was no real implication for the end client many didn’t.
After years of vague IR35 rules, in 2017 the government sought to revolutionise how IR35 was classified, introducing the new new ‘off-payroll’ rules. These rules applied to those working in the public sector only and were seen as the first step in an eventual plan to tackle the contracting community as a whole.
The new rules meant that contractors were no longer responsible for determining their IR35 status. Instead, the client who the workers were providing their services to were responsible with hefty fines for them if they got it wrong.
As a result, most public sector clients chose to classify all of their contractors as “inside” IR35 rather than run the risk of a penalty. This prompted widespread confusion and anger amongst the contractor community who saw their tax position change regardless of the reality of their situation.